Showing posts with label Startup. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Startup. Show all posts

Friday, November 9, 2012

Which State Is Best for Small Business? (Infographic)


Some states are better launch pads for startups than others -- a lot better. They make licensing a snap, keep taxes low and go out of their way to help entrepreneurs succeed with training and guidance. A survey earlier this year from Thumbtack.com and the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation revealed the best -- and, ugh, most challenging -- states and cities for entrepreneurs. Below, find out which states earned an A- or better grade -- and the laggards with D+ grades or worse.
Within the average-to-mediocre states for small businesses, the survey also uncovered several entrepreneurial oases -- in other words, cities where startups can thrive.
  • Colorado Springs, Colo.
  • Indianapolis
  • Las Vegas
  • Minneapolis
  • Nashville, Tenn.
  • Raleigh, N.C. 

Friday, October 19, 2012

Startup Weekends, Gurus Creating Businesses in 54 Hours


Ever wondered what it takes to be a tech entrepreneur?

Well, in about two weeks, Ogden will likely be a great place to find out.

Weber State University, Ogden city and local entrepreneurs are collaborating to bring "Startup Weekend Ogden" to the city from Nov. 1-3 at the Hilton Garden Inn Conference Center.

Startup Weekend is a registered not-forprofit organization that organizes 54-hour weekend events during which groups of developers, business managers, startup enthusiasts, marketing gurus, graphic artists and more pitch ideas for new startup companies.

Alex Lawrence, who is the Vice Provost of Innovation and Economic Development at WSU and one of the event's organizers, said all Startup Weekends follow the same basic model: anyone is welcome to give a threeminute pitch on their startup idea and then receive feedback from their peers.

Teams then organically form around the top ideas, as determined by popular vote, and a 54-hour frenzy of business model creation, coding, designing and market analysis follows.

The weekend culminates with presentations in front of local entrepreneurial leaders with another opportunity for critical feedback.

"We've had companies form on the spot and start generating revenue by the time the weekend is over," Lawrence said. "It can be pretty insane."

North Ogden resident Joel Grasmeyer said he will attend the conference to pitch an idea about a GPS-guided outdoor adventure software application.

"It's going to be a pretty intense weekend," said Grasmeyer, who owns Real Estate Tools, a company that creates real estate investment analysis software for the iPhone, iPad and Mac.

"To have all these people in the same room, kicking around ideas, is going to be pretty exciting."

Lawrence said Startup Weekend Ogden dovetails with other initiatives to bring tech startup business to Ogden.

Ogden city recently received $1 million in federal money to help fund the creation of a lab to train workers, as well as provide space for business startups in the field of software applications for mobile devices.

Mayor Mike Caldwell said the lab, which is at 2314 Washington Blvd., is expected to create 750 jobs and generate up to $4.6 million in private investment over 10 years.

"We're really trying to make Ogden a premier tech community," Lawrence said.

Startup Weekend Ogden will feature prizes, food from local restaurants and several guest speakers, including Utah Gov. Gary Herbert.


Source: (c) 2012 the Standard-Examiner (Ogden, Utah) Distributed by MCT Information Services

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

5 Social Media Metrics You Should Be Monitoring


There are hundreds of social media and web metrics that you could look at everyday if there was enough time and context to understand each of them.  But without overwhelming you with data and drowning out what is important, there are a few key metrics that you should be monitoring at all times.  Today we’ll cover the 5 metrics social media metrics that you should be aware of and monitoring for a pulse on your social business.
Let’s jump in, and happy monitoring!
Pinterest-Quote-Engagement1. Engagement – Engagement is one of the most critical areas of social to measure.  Are conversations happening with your brand when you release content?  Are fans liking or commenting on your Facebook page?  Are users pinning images, or retweeting tweets?  There are a slew of different ways to look at engagement depending on the social outposts your are participating on, but the key is that people see your message and interact with your brand.
If you notice a particular set of messages is not working, dont give up but try changing the messaging and measure the type of response that you achieve.  Look at what and how your competitors are doing across their social outposts, are they achieving a level of engagement?  If so what are they posting that’s different?  Evaluate their outreach and share information that makes your brand unique, that will likely bring the most engagement of all.
Tip: Make it fun to interact with your brand.  You dont have to post your latest press release on Facebook all the time, try some humor (if your audience will react well to it) and different variations of content to get fans involved.
2. Reach – What size is the audience seeing your content over all of the social networks that you participate in?  Is this audience growing or shrinking and at what rate?  These are key questions to consider when looking at your total social reach think of it as  the number of potential people that have potential to see your content.
Facebook-insights
Reach by itself does not tell the whole story but should be used in conjunction with other metrics to calculate the specific metrics that you are looking for.  For example, if we wanted to find out the percentage of people that were engaged with your page this week and tallied up all our ‘likes’ (let’s assume 609,750), then we would use the following formula:
Weekly Total Engagement Rate =  609,750/ 12,449,380 or 4.898%.
The point is that you can use total reach for a number of different metrics that are important to you and your business and simply calculate them by switching out the formula.  Try it out on your own metrics.
3. Referral Traffic - Getting fans to interact with your brand at various social outposts is great, but the real goal should ideally be to drive more sustainable and repeat traffic to your website.  To determine if you are accomplishing this look in your web analytics tool at referral traffic to see specifically where traffic is coming from.  For Google Analytics users, go to Traffic Sources > Sources > Referrals.
Once in this dashboard take a look at your top performing referral source, and the respective time on site and bounce rate for each.  If one particular source is producing a number of visitors but they are only staying on your page for minimal time and driving your bounce rate up – then it is likely not the right source for that particular piece of content.
Diving one level deeper, you can click on any content referrer to see which specific content is driving traffic or switch the primary dimension to landing page and then viewing the referring source that is driving traffic to that content.  This is important as if you have different series of blog posts and your first series is generating great traffic through Facebook, and your second through Pinterest than you now know where to target these different segments of posts for sharing.  On the whole that is simplifying the concept a lot but you should understand that if sharing content on a network is driving down your time on site, and your bounce rate up then it’s worth re-evaluating that as a real traffic source.
4. Share of Voice -  Share of Voice (SOV) is basically a measure of how much you’re mentioned or covered in comparison with your competitors.  If your competitors are being mentioned far more often share of voice is an easy measure of showing you this.  Ensure that you are participating in all of the relevant conversations for your brand regardless of where they occur, but most importantly wherever your key customers are.  There is a free tool to help determine your SOV Socialmention or if you have a budget it’s worth looking into a tool like Radian6 (now part of the Salesforce Marketing Cloud).
5. Influence - There are a number of different influence startups emerging like KloutPeerIndex, andKred.  Influence is an important metric to monitor because even if the people talking about your brand have large followings, whether they can influence others to take action is critical.  It’s also a great quick snapshot at how your brand is participating in social media against some competitors.
Mashable Klout Influence Score
 
 

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

6 PR Tips for Generating Publicity for Your Startup


Q: How do I get my business and myself more publicity? I want to get on TV and into bigger publications. I want my business on the front page.
- Jason Baudendistel
Southern Illinois University
A: When people or companies ask me, “What’s the best way to get my name in lights?” I typically redirect their energy and ask them to think about this statement: “If my business was to gain a massive amount of attention from my target audience, then my business would benefit from both a brand equity and growth standpoint.”
Inflated egos notwithstanding, the PR engine can be both a blessing and a curse — and if you are ill prepared, publicity can ruin the reputation of a business (or person) before the market has a chance to decide if you have a viable product or service.
So let’s take a step back and assume that you have a viable business and a general idea of your target audience. Let’s also assume that you’ve left your ego at the door and you have the human capital and bandwidth to sustain and grow your business if all of the sudden (like magic) you have a thousand new customers.
If the above assumptions are true, here are six principles of PR that can guide you in taking your product from lame to fame. Queue camera.
1. Make it emotional. Think about your story. Are you a travel app that makes it easier for single moms with kids to source discounted vacations because you saw a need for this after watching your sister go through it? Or are you a B2B product that makes task sharing easier among executives who wanted to have more time to spend with their kids? Is there an emotional element attached to your business, or is this just a straight up practical application?
2. Articulate your story. Here’s a good exercise to go through that may help you better understand how to position your product. Fill in the blanks with 20 to 50- word answers.
  • Our team created this product because…
  • The product has the following features…
  • Which will allow our users/customers to…
  • And success of the product will be measured like this…
3. Define your target user. Who is your intended user for this product? Is it everyone (bad sign!) or is it extremely niche, i.e. ex-pats living in major urban cities. Once you understand who you are serving, you can better understand which media channels will make sense for outreach.

4. Do your research. Who are your competitors and who is talking about them? Did they get a big write-up in TechCrunch, The Illinois Business Journal, or Entrepreneur magazine? Or do they have a lot of buzz in a particular community like dog walkers? Point being, don’t aim in the dark. Newsflash: 99 percent of products are not unique and they have predecessors. Use them to your advantage and figure out what tactics they used to get people talking about them.
5. Create a wish list. Pick the top 10 media outlets or blogs where you would like to be featured. Beyond that, pick 20 to 30 writers, bloggers, review sites or partners that would be able to get your product in front of at least 500,000 eyeballs. Meaning, their audience has a reach of at least 500,000. I’m not talking about unique visits to the website. I’m talking about actual distribution and engagement.
6. Pitch. Then and only then, tell journalists your story and offer them something unique to share with their audience. Make sure their audience is the correct one (see tip No. 3). It’s your job to make the connection for them. Allude to trends in the marketplace, or other products they’ve covered that are similar. Keep in mind that you must have something to offer them — they won’t do you any favors. It has to be a win-win.
Remember, publicity is a complex beast with highly variable outcomes. No guarantees exist in PR because the media ultimately has their own agenda. You must be 100 percent sure a target on your back won’t crush your business. Publicity is not the panacea for a product that isn’t selling, it should only be used to enhance a sustainable business.
Have a question for YE’s experts? Submit your questions in the comments section below and those with the most likes from other readers will be answered. On Twitter, use the hashtag #YEask. Include your first and last name, your location (city and state) and the name of your business.

Why isn't there a Mark Zuckerberg in China?


More specifically, why are there hardly any twenty-year-old wunderkind entrepreneurs in China?
I pulled the last 10 China IT IPOs in the US, and found that the founders were 33 when they started their companies.  At Innovation Works, the average entrepreneur age is also 33.  We all know the Y Combinator or Ron Conway are funding younger and younger entrepreneurs in the Valley.  What happened in China?
There are several major reasons why top Chinese entrepreneurs are 10 years older than their counterparts in the Silicon Valley:
  1. Chinese education tends to be better for depth than breadth.  In other words, when you graduate as a software engineer, you may have very strong fundamentals in math and engineering, but you don't get as much exposure to user experience, communications, product design, business acumen, team-work, etc. as you would in a typical US university.  Moreover, Chinese schools focus more on tests from textbooks, while American schools care more about learning-by-doing.  In short, the American education better prepares a student to be an entrepreneur.
  2. The top American young entrepreneurs tend to be rebellious and spontaneous -- Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Larry/Sergey, and Mark Zuckerberg all dropped out of school because they wanted to follow their heart and realize their dream.  But in China, the environment, culture, and education system care more about discipline, harmony, and conformity.  All students follow similar curriculum, and take standardized tests.  Grades are considered the primary measure of intelligence and success.  As a result, a Jobs-like rebel in China is much more likely to be shamed into oblivion, stifled into submission, or rejected into the dark side.
  3. The Chinese Internet market is a very tough environment, described by some as a gladiatorial fight to the death.  One company has registered a competitor's domain name and built an identical service to fool users; companies de-install each other's software and change user selections without informing the user; weibo (Chinese twitter) is used as a battleground for name-calling and rumor-mongering; lawsuits and arrests are common competitive escalations.  This is too dangerous a "playground" for a young CEO who hasn't had ten years of experience and a dozen scars from virtual duels.
So in China, VCs generally prefer the thirty-something entrepreneur who are more mature, experienced, and adept at execution.  They are more resilient and dependable, but perhaps less innovative and passionate.  They desire success, but may not "think different". They are a different breed of entrepreneurs from the Silicon boys.

Facebook R&D Goes Global: Opens Engineering Office In London, Its First Outside The U.S.


With the majority of Facebook’s 1 billion users, and subscriber growth, now coming from outside the U.S., the company is taking ever more steps to building out its global footprint to reach that audience. To that end, today Facebook opened up an engineering center in London, its first outside of the U.S. and is now hiring for people to staff it, following through on an announcement it first made inJuly.
This is both a good and bad thing, I think, for the London tech scene. On the one hand, it’s a sign of how the city is a magnet for good talent, and that Facebook — like Google, Amazon and others — see this as a natural base for developers in their global aims.
On the other, we have already heard smaller companies lament about how big companies like Google — and, incidentally, the financial industry — are major talent magnets when it comes to developers and other tech specialists in London. (That disparity has spawned events like the Silicon Milkroundabout to carry the flame for startups.) Having Facebook here, with its current status as an employer in great demand — could make the process of attracting engineering talent to smaller startups even more challenging.
Facebook is putting one of its top engineers in charge of London. Philip Su has previously led on Facebook’s Skype integration, and others on what Facebook calls its “landing team” have helped develop such central FB features such as the App Center, Timeline, Ticker and photo products.
That points to Facebook more or less creating a mirror structure here in London, working in a number of different areas rather than focusing necessarily only on services it might roll out outside the U.S.. Indeed, even those who are already getting recruited to work in London will still go through Facebook’s bootcamp in Menlo Park before joining the UK team later this month. The only steer that Facebook has given so far on what engineers will cover in London are that the engineers will work on a “range” of products including Facebook’s platform and mobile products. (Just as international is a big growth area for Facebook, so is mobile.)
That also means it will be run slightly differently from Facebook’s operations center in Dublin — which oversees areas like customer help and advertising sales for all regions outside of North America and so has a different geographical focus compared to Facebook’s California HQ.
“We’re excited to be building our first major European engineering centre in a city that is rapidly emerging as a global technology hub,” Facebook VP of Engineering Mike Schroepfer said today at an event that also had the UK’s Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne in attendance (pictured above). “The London Engineering team will play a crucial role in development of future products and core technology for Facebook.”
It should be pointed out that while this is Facebook’s first engineering center outside the U.S. it’s not Facebook’s first move to bring engineers to London. Given that London is a center for digital advertising, Facebook’s already had people on the ground here working with local agencies on social marketing services.
Facebook, citing data from Deloitte, says that the Facebook ecosystem has already contributed to the creation of 35,200 jobs in the UK (and only 30,000 hours of time wasted at work checking your FB account.. I kid!) Some 7,500 of those jobs are in the area of creating and monetizing Facebook apps, worth some £500 million annually.

M-Commerce Startup Branding Brand Goes From Bootstrapped To $7.5M Series A, Brings In Former GNC, Dick’s Sporting Goods Head As President


Branding Brand, a startup powering the mobile commerce for sites and mobile apps from – you guessed it – big-name brands, has raised $7.5 million in Series A funding and has now brought in Jeffrey R. Hennion as President. Hennion is the former head of e-commerce at GNC and Dick’s Sporting Goods, and will be helping Branding Brand manage its global marketing and e-commerce functions.
The Series A round, announced last week, was led by Insight Venture Partners, and saw participation from CrunchFund and Eastern Advisors. It’s the first outside investment for the company, which had been completely bootstrapped until now. The additional capital will be used to fund customer acquisition, technology development, and operations, the company reports.
The Pittsburgh-based company was founded in 2008 by three friends from Carnegie Mellon University, Joey Rahimi, Christopher Mason, and Christina Koshzow. The team launched its mobile platform at the end of 2009, which focuses on allowing brands to extend their presence to smartphones, tablets and in-store. Today, it’s grown to become the largest m-commerce provider to the Internet Retailer Top 500 and now has over 100 employees, up from 10 just two years ago.
Consumers may not know of Branding Brand by name, but they’ve surely interacted with some of its products. Branding Brand powers the sites and apps for American Eagle Outfitters, Anthropologie, The Children’s Place, Costco, Crate & Barrel, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Drugstore.com, Eastern Mountain Sports, GNC, Ralph Lauren, Sephora, Steve Madden, Timberland, Tumi, and West Marine. Because of its access to the m-commerce operations of these major companies, it has alos been able to provide us with high-level views of trends in the space. For example, in June, the company revealed data that showed that, despite an increase in social media-powered visits to brand’s mobile websites, conversions were actually coming down – and in particular Pinterest conversions were very weak.
Hennion is joining the company during a rapid growth period. “It is a unique time given the pace of innovation in mobile commerce and cross-channel integration,” he said, “and Branding Brand has rapidly emerged as the clear platform leader in this space.”

Now At 25M Users, Wix Brings Third-Party Apps To Its Website Builder With New Marketplace


Hard to believe, but the now-popular Iraeli-American startup,Wix.com, was founded in February 2006 — back when Tumblr was only a twinkle in David Karp’s eye. Since then, the company has made its name as a platform that allowed anyone, luddite or not, to build Flash-enabled websites and widgets in a jiffy.
The startup coasted along, adding functionality and growing steadily until it released its HTML5 builder in March of this year. In a sign of the times, Wix’s new product allowed users to build sites that would display across both PC and mobile browsers in a drag and drop format that co-founder Avishai Abrahami compared to “HTML5 for Dummies.”
Wix’s new functionality found adoption, as Billy reported in July that, from the time the HTML5 builder was launched in March, users had built one million websites using the new tool. Today, the startup is adding an important piece of the puzzle to support the growth of its HTML5 website builder, launching a new app market and SDK that will allow third-party developers to integrate their apps into Wix’s platform.
Essentially, the SDK enables app developers to create and distribute web apps to Wix’s audience for free. What’s cool about this is that the apps will require no download or technical knowledge to implement, meaning the marketplace won’t add any wrinkles or friction to the user experience. However, for users (and for Wix itself) opening this capacity to developers means that the site can offer a potentially huge new set of features, while maintaining drag-and-drop site design.
App developers, on the other hand, can offer their products and widgets either for free or at a cost, allowing them to generate revenue from Wix’s growing user base. For paid apps, Wix offers developers a 70-30 rev share, with Wix taking home 30 percent of sales.
And as to the size of its audience and the “market potential” for developers, not to sound like a Polyanna, but the startup’s user base is sizable and appears to be growing fast. In July of this year, for example, Wix had seen a total 20 million people use its platform. Today, in three months, the startup has added 5 million users, growing its user base to 25 million. Wix Director of Communications Eric Mason tells us that, on average, the startup is growing at a rate of one million new users per month.
Vanity stats aside, the new marketplace offers Wix an opportunity to scale its functionality, while keeping development costs to a minimum. To give users a taste of what it hopes will become a deep repository of apps and widgets, at launch today, the Wix App Market includes 25 apps, like Instagram, Tumblr, Soundcloud, DaPulse and RumbleTalk. So, now, when building their website using its HTML5 tools, users can connect their sites to their photo feed, blog archives and music playlists.
App developers can submit their apps at dev.wix.com. Anyone can submit, though apps are subject to approval by the company. Once apps are approved, they will be added to Wix’s HTML5 website builder, where site owners can then integrate them into their sites. Like the builder itself, all apps will be free, with some of them offering extended capabilities for a price.
At this low price point overall, app developers likely aren’t going to become billionaires building exclusively for the Wix platform, but with a user base that has pushed over 25 million, it’s a great way to add a supplementary revenue stream. Especially for developers who build awesome tools that fill existing gaps in the Wix framework or have already hit mainstream usage, a la Instagram and Tumblr.
However, Itzik Levy, the CEO of vCita, a scheduler and contact form (that’s much less well-known when compared to the two prior examples), said that even during two weeks of testing the app market’s limited beta, the company was seeing hundreds installations each day. We’ll see how things progress, but it could prove to be a relatively painless way to create some additional brand awareness and supplementary revenue.

Location-Sharing App Glympse Adds Groups, Calendar Integration To Eliminate All Those “I’m Running Late” Messages


Glympse, the location-sharing app which first debuted back in 2009, is still hanging in there. The app arrived at a time when its competitors were the original, location-based social networks such as Loopt and Brightkite, now long gone. But Glympse survived – and today, it’s getting a revamp. The company, which has slowly grown its install base to 3 million users, is updating its mobile apps on Android, iPhone and iPad with several new features, including support for groups, calendar integration, and more.
Although the app looks a lot different now than it did back in May 2009, the core functionality has evolved very little over the years. Instead of offering a social network for check-ins, Glympse always believed there was value in the more utilitarian functionality of sharing your location with friends on a more individualized basis. That is, instead of making your location continually public to your social network, you would send a Glympse which would automatically share your current location for a set amount of time, allowing friends or colleagues to track your approach as you head their way for a meetup or a meeting. Put simply, it’s ephemeral, disposable location-sharing.
Today Glympse is hoping to expand adoption with the introduction of new use cases. With Glympse Groups, for example, the idea is to allow a group of users to share their location during common activities, like sporting events, conferences, meetings, or social gatherings. It’s an idea somewhat reminiscent of the location-sharing apps that made the scene at SXSW 2011 – for example, Beluga, GroupMe, and the like. (Beluga and GroupMe have since been acquired, the former by Facebook, the latter by Skype. Other competitors weren’t as fortunate).
Meanwhile, with Glympse’s newly added Calendar integration, the app allows users to automatically send out location updates associated with a particular event, so participants can avoid the “on my way” and “running late” emails, calls and texts.
Also arriving today is a “request a Glympse” feature, which lets current users request that their friends or family send them a response with their location via Glympse. The feature, of course, requires the recipient to download the app to do so, if they have not done so already.
According to CEO Bryan Trussel, the changes were brought on by a combination of user feedback, analytics, and a bit of intuition. “The main thrust in the new version of Glympse was moving from solely one-way sharing – me letting you know where I am – to mutual sharing, which makes it easier to share location two ways or with a specified group,” he explains. “Both of these were possible with the old app, but too cumbersome. For example, now with Request-A-Glympse, it’s two clicks for me to ask where you are, and a single click to respond.”
Trussel says Glympse is primarily used by consumers, but the Calendar integration is aimed at attracting business users to the service, as it streamlines the process of sending a Glympse to meeting participants. “The new feature imports the attendees, the location, and the meeting name and time automatically,” he says. “It went from a 30-second to 3-second effort.”
Glympse raised $7.5 million in June 2011, and more recently announced a partnership which sees its service integrated into the dash of 2013 Mercedes-Benz Series A Class vehicles. Trussel also hints that other partnerships with third-parties are on the way. That’s good news, then, because 3 million users pales in a time when some industry folks are proclaiming 10 million is the new 1 million.
You may have lumped Glympse in the location-based social app bucket, the truth is that the startup’s main competitor is still SMS. “We’re comfortable that in many ways we’re superior now,” says Trussel. But that’s a statement that’s been true of a number of companies which took on SMS with an advanced feature set, but were never able to gain critical mass.


Maid Service For The Masses? YC-Backed Pathjoy Offers Affordable Housecleaning With Easy Web Booking


Adora Cheung, co-founder and CEO of Pathjoy, said her goal is to make maid service “ubiquitous” — a basic service for a broad audience, rather than a luxury for the rich.
To make that happen, Cheung and her brother/co-founder Albert are offering four main twists on the traditional cleaning service model. First, she said Pathjoy is more affordable, charging only $20 an hour, compared to the $40 charged by most other cleaning services. (The default apartment cleaning on Pathjoy takes 2.5 hours, so it would cost $50.) Second, it’s more convenient, because you can book, cancel, and reschedule cleanings from the Pathjoy website, rather than having to call. Third, Pathjoy performs a background check on every cleaner, then bonds, insures, and trains them, so you’ve got some assurances of high-quality service.
Those are probably the important points for the customers, but Cheung said there’s a fourth goal — making sure the cleaners are well-treated too.
Now, some of those goals may seem a bit paradoxical. How can you promise high quality and good treatment of cleaners if you’re charging less? Cheung said it’s because she and her brother actually spent some time working as cleaners after they decided to launch a cleaning startup, so they’ve figured out how to take a lot of the inefficiencies out of the industry. (Cheung said that experience and focus gives Pathjoy an advantage over startups that offer cleaning as part of a broader range of services.)  Perhaps understandably, she didn’t go into too many details, but she pointed to the transition from phone to web booking as one example. Here’s another:
We’re also streamlining the way we go into a city. We can scale up the workforce at super high quality. We know where to get the cleaners and where to get the demand. It’s a lot of moving pieces, and it’s hard if you just showed up and had nothing.
To test it out, I signed up for a cleaning of my own, and the process went as smoothly as Cheung promised. Making a reservation took about a minute (I got a little hung up because I didn’t know the square footage of my apartment), then I got email and phone confirmations the day before the appointment, and they also sent me my cleaner’s profiel so I’d know who she was.
And the cleaning experience was great. It took a longer than expected (apparently that’s normal for first-time cleanings), but Rana was super-friendly, offering me tips on how to keep things clean in the future, while also being unobtrusive and allowing me to work when I needed to. Apparently she’s one of the more experienced cleaners, but since she’s also involved in training the newbies, hopefully some of that rubs off.
Rana also gave me some insight into one of Pathjoy’s other innovations — she’s figured out a way to pack all of her cleaning supplies into a relatively small box that she was able to carry on mass transit, and other cleaners are given a similar kit. After all, parking can be a big challenge, especially in an urban environment, and tickets can quickly turn into a big expense.
Most importantly, my apartment is cleaner now than it has ever been. I’m totally hooked.
Pathjoy has raised a seed round of undisclosed size from Y Combinator, First Round Capital, PayPal and Slide founder Max Levchin (Cheung was a product manager at Slide), Paul Graham, and 500 Startups. Apparently Cheung and her brother actually graduated from YC two years ago, but it took them a while to settle on a startup idea that might work.
Initially, I was a little skeptical about whether it makes sense to consider Pathjoy a tech startup, since a big part of its operations don’t have anything to do with technology (at least, not web or mobile technology) at all. Still, the web ordering is pretty great, and judging from the positive response this idea got in the TechCrunch office, the service could certainly take off in the startup world.
Even though it’s officially launching in the press today, the Pathjoy site started offering cleaning in the Bay Area back in July. Cheung said the site had “hundreds” of customers last month, and that it’s doubling or tripling every month.

Friday, October 12, 2012

Dark Social: We Have the Whole History of the Web Wrong


Here's a pocket history of the web, according to many people. In the early days, the web was just pages of information linked to each other. Then along came web crawlers that helped you find what you wanted among all that information. Some time around 2003 or maybe 2004, the social web really kicked into gear, and thereafter the web's users began to connect with each other more and more often. Hence Web 2.0, Wikipedia, MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, etc. I'm not strawmanning here. This is the dominant history of the web as seen, for example, in this Wikipedia entry on the 'Social Web.' 

tl;dr version 
1. The sharing you see on sites like Facebook and Twitter is the tip of the 'social' iceberg. We are impressed by its scale because it's easy to measure.
2. But most sharing is done via dark social means like email and IM that are difficult to measure.
3. According to new data on many media sites, 69% of social referrals came from dark social. 20% came from Facebook.
4. Facebook and Twitter do shift the paradigm from private sharing to public publishing. They structure, archive, and monetize your publications.
But it's never felt quite right to me. For one, I spent most of the 90s as a teenager in rural Washington and my web was highly, highly social. We had instant messenger and chat rooms and ICQ and USENET forums and email. My whole Internet life involved sharing links with local and Internet friends. How was I supposed to believe that somehow Friendster and Facebook created a social web out of what was previously a lonely journey in cyberspace when I knew that this has not been my experience? True, my web social life used tools that ran parallel to, not on, the web, but it existed nonetheless. 

To be honest, this was a very difficult thing to measure. One dirty secret of web analytics is that the information we get is limited. If you want to see how someone came to your site, it's usually pretty easy. When you follow a link from Facebook to The Atlantic, a little piece of metadata hitches a ride that tells our servers, "Yo, I'm here from Facebook.com." We can then aggregate those numbers and say, "Whoa, a million people came here from Facebook last month," or whatever. 

There are circumstances, however, when there is no referrer data. You show up at our doorstep and we have no idea how you got here. The main situations in which this happens are email programs, instant messages, some mobile applications*, and whenever someone is moving from a secure site ("https://mail.google.com/blahblahblah") to a non-secure site (http://www.theatlantic.com). 

This means that this vast trove of social traffic is essentially invisible to most analytics programs. I call it DARK SOCIAL. It shows up variously in programs as "direct" or "typed/bookmarked" traffic, which implies to many site owners that you actually have a bookmark or typed in www.theatlantic.com into your browser. But that's not actually what's happening a lot of the time. Most of the time, someone Gchatted someone a link, or it came in on a big email distribution list, or your dad sent it to you. 

Nonetheless, the idea that "social networks" and "social media" sites created a social web is pervasive. Everyone behaves as if the traffic your stories receive from the social networks (Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, StumbleUpon) is the same as all of your social traffic. I began to wonder if I was wrong. Or at least that what I had experienced was a niche phenomenon and most people's web time was not filled with Gchatted and emailed links. I began to think that perhaps Facebook and Twitter has dramatically expanded the volume of -- at the very least -- linksharing that takes place. 

Everyone else had data to back them up. I had my experience as a teenage nerd in the 1990s. I was not about to shake social media marketing firms with my tales of ICQ friends and the analogy of dark social to dark energy. ("You can't see it, dude, but it's what keeps the universe expanding. No dark social, no Internet universe, man! Just a big crunch.")


And then one day, we had a meeting with the real-time web analytics firm, Chartbeat. Like many media nerds, I love Chartbeat. It lets you know exactly what's happening with your stories, most especially where your readers are coming from. Recently, they made an accounting change that they showed to us. They took visitors who showed up without referrer data and split them into two categories. The first was people who were going to a homepage (theatlantic.com) or a subject landing page (theatlantic.com/politics). The second were people going to any other page, that is to say, all of our articles. These people, they figured, were following some sort of link because no one actually types "http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/10/atlast-the-gargantuan-telescope-designed-to-find-life-on-other-planets/263409/." They started counting these people as what they call direct social. 

The second I saw this measure, my heart actually leapt (yes, I am that much of a data nerd). This was it! They'd found a way to quantify dark social, even if they'd given it a lamer name! 

On the first day I saw it, this is how big of an impact dark social was having on The Atlantic. 


Just look at that graph. On the one hand, you have all the social networks that you know. They're about 43.5 percent of our social traffic. On the other, you have this previously unmeasured darknet that's delivering 56.5 percent of people to individual stories. This is not a niche phenomenon! It's more than 2.5x Facebook's impact on the site. 

Day after day, this continues to be true, though the individual numbers vary a lot, say, during a Reddit spike or if one of our stories gets sent out on a very big email list or what have you. Day after day, though, dark social is nearly always our top referral source. 

Dark social is even more important across this broader set of sites. Almost 69% of social referrals were dark! Facebook came in second at 20%. Twitter was down at 6%.
Perhaps, though, it was only The Atlantic for whatever reason. We do really well in the social world, so maybe we were outliers. So, I went back to Chartbeat and asked them to run aggregate numbers across their media sites. 

Get this. Dark social is even more important across this broader set of sites. Almost 69 percent of social referrals were dark! Facebook came in second at 20 percent. Twitter was down at 6 percent. 

All in all, direct/dark social was 17.5 percent of total referrals; only search at 21.5 percent drove more visitors to this basket of sites. (FWIW, at The Atlantic, social referrers far outstrip search. I'd guess the same is true at all the more magaziney sites.)

There are a couple of really interesting ramifications of this data. First, on the operational side, if you think optimizing your Facebook page and Tweets is "optimizing for social," you're only halfway (or maybe 30 percent) correct. The only real way to optimize for social spread is in the nature of the content itself. There's no way to game email or people's instant messages. There's no power users you can contact. There's no algorithms to understand. This is pure social, uncut.

Second, the social sites that arrived in the 2000s did not create the social web, but they did structure it. This is really, really significant. In large part, they made sharing on the Internet an act of publishing (!), with all the attendant changes that come with that switch. Publishing social interactions makes them more visible, searchable, and adds a lot of metadata to your simple link or photo post. There are some great things about this, but social networks also give a novel, permanent identity to your online persona. Your taste can be monetized, by you or (much more likely) the service itself. 

Third, I think there are some philosophical changes that we should consider in light of this new data. While it's true that sharing came to the web's technical infrastructure in the 2000s, the behaviors that we're now all familiar with on the large social networks was present long before they existed, and persists despite Facebook's eight years on the web. The history of the web, as we generally conceive it, needs to consider technologies that were outside the technical envelope of "webness." People layered communication technologies easily and built functioning social networks with most of the capabilities of the web 2.0 sites in semi-private and without the structure of the current sites. 

If what I'm saying is true, then the tradeoffs we make on social networks is not the one that we're told we're making. We're not giving our personal data in exchange for the ability to share links with friends. Massive numbers of people -- a larger set than exists on any social network -- already do that outside the social networks. Rather, we're exchanging our personal data in exchange for the ability to publish and archive a record of our sharing. That may be a transaction you want to make, but it might not be the one you've been told you made. 

* Chartbeat datawiz Josh Schwartz said it was unlikely that the mobile referral data was throwing off our numbers here. "Only about four percent of total traffic is on mobile at all, so, at least as a percentage of total referrals, app referrals must be a tiny percentage," Schwartz wrote to me in an email. "To put some more context there, only 0.3 percent of total traffic has the Facebook mobile site as a referrer and less than 0.1 percent has the Facebook mobile app."

SaaS Metrics – A Guide to Measuring and Improving What Matters


This blog post looks at the high level goals of a SaaS business and drills down layer by layer to expose the key metrics that will help drive success. Metrics for metric’s sake are not very useful. Instead the goal is to provide a detailed look at what management must focus on to drive a successful SaaS business. For each metric, we will also look at what is actionable.
Before going any further, I would like to thank the management team at HubSpot, and Gail Goodman of Constant Contact, who sits on the HubSpot board. A huge part of the material that I write about below comes my experiences working with them. In particular HubSpot’s management team is comprised of a group of very bright individuals that are all very metrics driven, and they have been clear thought leaders in developing the appropriate tools to drive their business. I’d also like to thank John Clancy, who until recently was President of Iron Mountain Digital, a $230m SaaS business, and Alastair Mitchell, CEO and founder of Huddle.
Let’s start by looking at the high level goals, and then drill down from there:
image

Key SaaS Goals

  • Profitability: needs no further explanation.
    • MRR Monthly Recurring Revenue: In a SaaS business, one of the most important numbers to watch is MRR. It is likely a key contributor to Profitability.
  • Cash: very critical to watch in a SaaS business, as there can be a high upfront cash outlay to acquire a customer, while the cash payments from the customer come in small increments over a long period of time. This problem can be somewhat alleviated by using longer term contracts with advance payments.
    • Months to recover CAC: one of the best ways to look at the capital efficiency of your SaaS business is to look at how many months of revenue from a customer are required to recover your cost of acquiring that customer(CAC). In businesses such as banking and wireless carriers, where capital is cheap and abundant, they can afford a long payback period before they recover their investment to acquire a customer (typically greater than one year). In the startup world where capital is scarce and expensive, you will need to do better. My own rule says that startups need to recover their cost of customer acquisition in less than 12 months.
      (Note: there are other web sites and blogs that talk about the CAC ratio, with a complex formula to calculate it. This is effectively a more complicated way of saying the same thing. However I have found that most people cannot relate well to the notion of a CAC ratio, but they can easily relate to the idea of how many months of revenue it will take to recover their investment to acquire a customer. Hence my preference for the term Months to Recover CAC.)
  • Growth: usually a critical success factor to gaining market leadership. There is clear evidence that once one company starts to emerge as a market leader, there is a cycle of positive reinforcement, as customers prefer to buy from the market leader, and the market leader gets the most discussion in the press, blogosphere, and social media.

Two Key Guidelines for SaaS startups

image
The above guidelines are not hard and fast rules. They are what I have observed to be needed by looking at a wide variety of SaaS startups. As a business moves past the startup stage, these guidelines may be relaxed.
In the next sections, we will drill down on the high level SaaS Goals to get to the components that drive each of these.

Three ways to look at Profitability

image
  1. Micro-Economics (per customer profitability): Micro-economics is the term used to describe looking at the economics of your business on a single customer level. Most business models (with a few exceptions such as marketplaces) are based around a simple principle: acquire customers and then monetize them. Micro-economics is about measuring the numbers behind these two essential ingredients of a customer interaction. The goal is to make sure the fundamental underpinnings of your business are sound: how much it cost to acquire your customers, and how much you can monetize them. i.e. CAC and LTV (cost of acquiring a customer, and lifetime value of the customer). In a SaaS business, you have a great business if LTV is significantly greater than CAC. My rule of thumb is that LTV must be at least 3x greater than CAC. (As mentioned elsewhere in this blog, your startup will die if your long term number for CAC is higher than your LTV. See Startup Killer: The cost of acquiring customers.)
  2. Overall profitability (standard accounting method): This looks a the standard accounting way of deriving profitability: revenue – COGS – Expenses.  The diagram also notes that Revenue is made up of MRR + Services Revenue. Since MRR is such a critical element, there will be a deeper drill down to understand the key component drivers.
  3. Profitability per Employee: it can be useful to look at the factors contributing to profitability on a per employee basis, and benchmark your company against the rest of the industry. Expenses per Employee is usually around $180-200k annually for businesses with all their employees in the US. (To calculate the number take the total of all expenses, not just salaraies, and divide by the number of employees.) Clearly to be profitable in the long term, you will want to see revenue per employee climb to be higher than expenses, taking into account your gross margin %.

Drill down on MRR

image
MRR is computed by multiplying the total number of paying customers by the average amount that they pay you each month (ARPU).
  • Total Customers:  a key metric for any SaaS company. This increases with new additions coming out the bottom of the sales funnel, and decreases by the number of customers that churn. Both of these are key metrics, and we will drill down into them later.
  • ARPU – average monthly revenue per customer: (The term ARPU comes from the wireless carriers where U stands for user.)  This is another extremely imporant variable that can be tweaked in the SaaS model. If you read my blog post on the JBoss story, you will see that one of the key ways that we grew that business was to take the average annual deal size from $10k, to $50k.  Given that the other parts of the pipeline worked with the same numbers and conversion rates, this grew the business by 5x.  We will drill down into how you can do the same thing a little further on.

Drill down on Micro-Economics (Per Customer Profitability)

Our goal is to see a graph that looks like the following:
image
To achieve this, lets look at the component parts of each line, to see what variables we can use to drive the curves:
image
As mentioned earlier, customer profitability = LTV – CAC.

Drill down on LTV

Drilling down into the factors affecting LTV, we see the following:
LTV = ARPU x Average Lifetime of a Customer – the Cost to Serve them (COGS)
It turns out that the Average Lifetime of a Customer is computed by 1/Churn Rate. As an example, if a you have a 50% churn rate, your average customer lifetime will be 1 divided by 50%, or 2 months. In most companies that I work with, they ignore tracking the average lifetime, but instead track the monthly churn rate religiously.
The importance of a low churn rate cannot be overstated. If your churn rate is high, then it is a clear indication of a problem with customer satisfaction. We will drill down later into how you can measure the factors contributing to Churn Rate, and talk about how you can improve them.

Drill down on CAC

The formula to compute CAC is:
CAC = Total cost of Sales & Marketing  /  No of Deals closed
It turns out that we are actually interested in two CAC numbers. One that looks purely at marketing program costs, and one that also takes into consideration the people and other expenses associated with running the sales and marketing organization. The first of these gives us an idea of how well we could do if we have a low touch, or touchless sales model, where the human costs won’t rise dramatically over time as we grow the lead flow.  The second number is more important for sales models that require more human touch to close the deal. In those situations the human costs will contribute greatly to CAC, and need to be taken into consideration to understand the true micro-economics.
I am often asked when it is possible to start measuring this and get a realistic number. Clearly there is no point in measuring this in the very early days of a startup, when you are still trying to refine product/market fit. However as you get to the point of having a repeatable sales model, this number becomes important, as that is the time when you will usually want to hit the accelerator pedal. It would be wrong to hit the accelerator pedal on a business that has unprofitable micro-economics. (When you are computing the costs for a very young company, it would be fair to remove the costs for people like the VP of Sales and VP of Marketing, as you will not hire more of these as you scale the company.)
When we look at how to lower CAC, there are a number of important variables that can be tweaked:
  • Sales Funnel Conversion rates: a funnel that takes the same number of leads and converts them at twice the rate, will not only result in 2x more closed customers, but will also lower CAC by half.  This is a very important place to focus energy, and a large part of this web site is dedicated to talking about how to do that. We will drill down into the Sales Funnel conversion rates next.
  • Marketing Program Costs: driving leads into the top of your sales funnel will usually involve a number of marketing programs. These could vary from pay per click advertising, to email campaigns, radio ads, tradeshows, etc. We will drill down into how to measure and control these costs later.
  • Level of Touch Required: a key factor that affects CAC is the amount of human sales touch required to convert a lead into a sale. Businesses that have a touchless conversion have spectacular economics: you can scale the number of leads being poured into the top of the funnel, and not worry about growing a sales organization, and the associated costs. Sadly most SaaS companies that I work with don’t have a touchless conversion. However it is a valuable goal to consider. What can you do to simplify both your product and your sales process to lower the amount of touch involved? This topic is covered at the bottom of a prior blog post:  Startup Killer: the cost of acquiring customers.
  • Personnel costs: this is directly related to the level of touch required. To see if you are improving both of these, you may find it useful to measure your Personnel costs as a % of CAC over time.

Drill down on Sales Funnel Conversion Rates

The metrics that matter for each sales funnel, vary from one company to the next depending on the steps involved in the funnel. However there is a common way to measure each step, and the overall funnel, regardless of your sales process. That involves measuring two things for each step:  the number of leads that went into the top of that step, and the conversion rate to the next step in the funnel (see below).
image
You will also want to measure the overall funnel effectiveness by measuring the number of leads that go into the top of the funnel, and the conversion rate for the entire funnel process to signed customers.
The funnel diagram above shows a very simple process for a SaaS company with a touchless conversion. If you have a conversion process involving a sales organization, you will want to add those steps to the funnel process to get insights into the performance of your sales organization. For example, your inside sales process might look like the following:
image
Here if we look at the closed deals and overall conversion rates by sales rep, we will have a good idea of who our best reps are. For lower performing reps, it is useful to look at the intermediate conversion rates, as someone that is doing a poor job of, say, converting demos to closed deals could be an indication that they need demo training from people that have high conversion rates for demos. (Or, as Mark Roberge, VP of Sales at HubSpot, pointed out, it could also mean that they did a poor job of qualifying people that they put into the Demo stage.)
These metrics give you the insight you need into your sales and marketing machine, and those insights give you a roadmap for what actions you need to take to improve conversion rates.

Using Funnel Metrics in forward planning

Another key value of having these conversion rates is the ability to understand the implications of future forecasts. For example, lets say your company wants to do $4m in the next quarter. You can work backwards to figure out how many demos/trials that means, and given the sales productivity numbers – how many salespeople are required, and going back a stage earlier, how many leads are going to be required. These are crucial planning numbers that can change staffing levels, marketing program spend levels, etc.

Drill down by Customer Type

If you have different customer types, you will want to look at all the CAC and LTV metrics for each different customer type, to understand the profitability by customer type. Often times this can lead you to a decision to focus more energy on the most profitable customer type.

Drill down into ROI per Marketing Program

My experiences with SaaS startups indicate that they usually start with a couple of lead generation programs such as Pay Per Click Google Ad-words, radio ads, etc. What I have found is that each of these lead sources tends to saturate over time, and produce less leads for more dollars invested. As a result, SaaS companies will need to be constantly evaluating new lead sources that they can layer in on top of the old to keep growing.
image
Since the conversion rates and costs per lead vary quite considerably, it is important to also measure the overall ROI by lead source:
image
Growing leads fast enough to feed the front end of the funnel is one of the perennial challenges for any SaaS company, and is likely to be one of the greatest limiting factors to growth. If you are facing that situation, the most powerful advice I can give you is to start investing in Inbound Marketing techniques (see Get Found using Inbound Marketing). This will take time to ramp up, but if you can do it well, will lead to far lower lead costs, and greater scaling than other paid techniques. Additionally the typical SaaS buyer is clearly web-savvy, and therefore very likely to embrace inbound marketing content and touchless selling techniques.
From Alistair Mitchell, CEO of Huddle: “Just calculating CAC can be extremely complicated, given the numerous ways in which people find out about your service.  To stop getting too bogged down in the detail, its best to start with a blended rate that just takes your total spend on marketing (people, pr, acquisition etc) and split this across all your customers, regardless of type or source. Then, once you’ve got comfortable with that, you can start to break CAC down by the different customer types and elements of your inbound funnel, and start measuring specific campaigns for their contribution to each customer type.”

Drill down into Churn Rate

image
As described in the section on LTV, Churn Rate has a direct effect on LTV. If you can halve your churn rate, it will double your LTV. It is an enormously important variable in a SaaS business. Churn can usually be attributed to low customer satisfaction. We can measure customer satisfaction using customer surveys, and in particular, the Net Promoter Score.
If you are using longer term contracts, another key metric to focus on is renewals. From John Clancy, ex-President of Iron Mountain Digital: “
Non-renewals add to churn, but they can have different drivers. We spent a lot of time examining our renewal rates and found that a single digit improvement made a huge difference. Often times the driver on a non-renewal is economic – the internal IT department has mounted a campaign to bring the solution back in house. SaaS businesses need to identify renewal dates and treat the renewal as a sales cycle (it’s much easier and less expensive than a new sale, but it deserves the same level of attention) Many SaaS businesses make the mistake of taking renewals for granted.”
A good predictor of when a customer is about to churn is their product usage pattern. Low levels of usage indicate a lack of commitment to the product. It can be a good idea to instrument the product to measure this, looking for particular features our usage patterns that are correlated with stickiness, or a likelihood to churn.
Another measurement tool that can be very useful in understanding churn is to look at a Cohort Analysis. The term cohort refers to a group of customers that started in the same month. The reason for doing this is that churn varies over time, and using a single churn number for all customers will mask this. Cohort analysis shows:
  • How churn varies over time (the green call out below).
  • How churn rates are changing with newer cohorts, (the red call out below)  For example in the early days of your SaaS company, you may have serious product problems and lose a lot of customers in the first month. Over time your product gets better, and the first month churn rate will drop.
Cohort analysis will show this, instead of mixing all the churn rates into single number.
image
Here’s a comment on Cohort Analysis from Alastair Mitchell, CEO of Huddle: “I actually think this is more important than churn, for the simple fact that churn varies over the lifetime of a customer cohort, and just looking at monthly churn can be very misleading.  Also, given the importance of payback in a year – you really want to look at churn over the course of a 12 months cohort. For instance, in the first 3 months of a monthly paying customer you will see high churn (3 is a recurring ‘magic’ number in all of retail), then reduced churn (sometimes even positive churn) over the next 3 months less and then probably more stable spend over the next 6 months. The number you really care about is the % of customers spending after 12 months (not necessarily on a monthly basis) as that’s what matters for your CAC payback calculations.”

Two variables that really matter

As we saw above, there are two variables that have a huge effect on a SaaS business: funnel conversion rate, and churn, and it is not a bad idea to graph them as shown below.
image

Drill down into ARPU (Average Revenue per Customer)

image
ARPU is often different for different customer categories, and should be measured separately for each category. It can usually be driven up by focusing on:
  • Product Mix: adding products to the range, and using bundles, and cross-sell and up-sell
  • Scalable Pricing:  there are always some customers that are willing to pay more for your product than others. The trick is developing a multi-dimensional pricing matrix that allows you to scale pricing for larger customers that derive more value from the product. This could be pricing by the seat used (Salesforce.com), or by some other metric such as number of individuals mailed in email campaigns (Eloqua).
    If you are using scalable pricing, it will be valuable to measure what the distribution is of customers along the various axes. You could imagine taking an action to do after more seats inside of existing customers as a way to drive more revenue. etc.

Drill down into Cash

image
We already discussed Months to recover CAC as a key variable. There is another way to affect Cash: which is using longer term contracts and incenting your customers to pay for 6, 12, 24, or even 36 months up front in advance. This can mean the difference between needing to raise tons of venture capital and giving away ownership, or being able to grow the business in a self-funded manner. Given the cost of capital, you can often calculate what discount makes sense. (If capital is cheap and freely available, it doesn’t make sense to give much discount.)
If you do use longer term contracts, it will be important to measure “Discretionary Churn”. Since some of your customers are locked in and cannot churn, they could artificially lower your overall churn numbers. The way to understand what is really going on is to look at the discretionary churn, which is the churn rate for all customers that are at the point where they have the option to churn, removing those whose contracts would have prevented them from churning.

Cash Management and forecasting

Cash is one of the most important items to get right in any startup. Run out of cash, and your business will come grinding to a halt regardless of how good any of your other metrics may be. One of the most important ways to run a SaaS company is to look at CashFlow profitability (not recognized revenue profitability). What is the difference: If your business only gets paid month by month, there will be no difference, but if you get longer term contracts, and get paid in advance, you will receive more cash upfront than you can recognize as revenue, so your cash flow profitability will look better than your revenue profitability, and is a more realistic view of whether you can survive day to day on the money coming in the door.
Here is another comment from Alastair Mitchell of Huddle on this topic: “SaaS companies tuning their model should think not just in terms of the months to recover CAC, but also the topline amount of cash required to get to cashflow profitability (or the next funding round). This is probably the single biggest mistake I see in early stage companies. They don’t look ahead, using these metrics, to figure out that if the time to repay CAC is 12 months, then in aggregate they are going to need 12 months of CAC spend PLUS the number of months required of further growth to cover their operating costs (mostly engineering) BEFORE they are even cashflow positive (let alone revenue profitability). Most businesses I see fundamentally miss this and end up short; frequently through under-estimating the time to recover CAC, and churn. The readers of this blog should be focused on cashflow profitability, not revenue profitability. (Hence why your point about annual/upfront contracts is so important)”

Drill down into Growth

image
Focusing on Growth as a separate parameter can be highly valuable. It is the nature of a SaaS business to grow MRR month on month, even if you only added the same number of customers every month. However your goal should be to grow the number of new customers that you sign up every month. You can do this by focusing on:
  • Improvement in the overall funnel conversion rate
  • Lead Generation Growth
  • Growth in Funnel Capacity
The first two have been covered already. The last bullet: Growth in Funnel Capacity is an often overlooked metric that can bite you unexpectedly if you don’t pay attention to it. In my second startup, I had a situation where sales growth stalled after growing extremely rapidly for a couple of years. The problem, as it turned out, was that we had stopped hiring new sales people after reaching 20 people, a number that felt very large to me, and had maxed out on sales capacity. We started sales hiring again, and a couple of years later the business hit a $100m run rate. I witnessed a similar phenomenon at Solidworks, when after 2-3 years of phenomenal growth, their growth slowed. It turned out that their channel sales capacity had stopped growing. Solidworks started measuring and managing something that would later turn out to be a critical metric: channel capacity in terms of the number of FTE (Full Time Equivalent) sales people in their channel, and the average productivity per FTE. This has helped propel them to over $400m in annual revenues.
Another great way to grow your business is by adding new products that can be up-sold, or product features that can lead to a higher price point. Since you already have a billable contract, it is extremely easy to increase the amount being charged, and this can often be done with a touchless sale.

Other Metrics

There are a series of less important metrics that can still be useful to be aware of. I have listed some of these in the diagrams below:
image
image
After posting the above, I received a note from Gail Goodman of Constant Contact, noting that they include the cost of on-boarding a customer in CAC, not LTV as I have shown. Given that they are a public company with significant accounting scrutiny, this is likely the right way to do things.

Conclusions

If you have kept reading this long, it likely means that you are likely an executive in a SaaS company, and truly have a reason to care about this depth of analysis. I would very much like to hear from you in the comments section below to see if I have missed out on metrics that you think are important.
The main conclusion to draw from this article, is that a SaaS business can be optimized in many ways. This article aims to help you understand what the levers are, and how they can affect the key goals of Profitability, Cash, Growth, and market share. To pull those levers requires that you first measure the variables, and watch them as they change over time.
It also requires that you implement a very metrics driven culture, which can only be done from the top. The CEO needs to use these metrics in her staff meetings, and those execs need to use them with their staff, etc. Human nature is such that if you show someone a metric, they will automatically work to try to improve it. That kind of a culture will lead to true operational excellence, and hopefully great success.
Be Sociable, Share!

OrignalPost