Showing posts with label Election2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election2012. Show all posts

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Michelle Obama and Ann Romney: Social Media Breakdown 2012


Social media has played a huge role in this year’s presidential campaign, not just representing the candidates themselves, but also their biggest supporters: their wives. And Michelle Obama and Ann Romney are no exception.
Traditionally, candidates’ wives have supported their husbands by reaching women voters and humanizing the candidates by highlighting their life outside of the campaign. In the age of social media, the channels for broadcasting these messages are new, but the voice is very similar to first ladies and aspiring first ladies we’ve seen in the past. Social media’s wide reach makes their messages even more prominent and even showcases these remarkable women’s personal accomplishments more than we’ve seen in past campaigns.
To give you a view of each wife’s social media efforts, we’ve compiled the following breakdown of activity from their social channels with compiled screenshots and various social media examples from around the web. Take a look at how both Michelle Obama and Ann Romney have capitalized on the potential of campaigning in the social world.

Social Stats

Here’s the lowdown on the networks both women use and the followings they have. You’ll notice that although Michelle Obama has many more followers in the networks, Ann Romney is relatively new when it comes to social media and hasn’t had as much time to build up a comparable following.

Michelle Obama

  • 1,659,570 followers
  • 547 tweets
  • This account is run by #Obama2012 campaign staff. Tweets from the First Lady are signed -mo.
  • 8.4 million Likes
  • Doesn’t seem to update personally
  • 41,840 followers
  • 53 pins
  • Boards:
    • People who inspire me
    • Recipe ideas
    • Around the White House
    • Great memories
    • Family




Ann Romney

  • 132,865 followers
  • 59 tweets
  • This account is run by Ann, herself
  • 318k likes
  • Updates personal – first person
  • 12,493 followers
  • 167 pins
  • Boards:
    • July 4th Recipes
    • Crafts / DIY
    • Things I Love
    • Patriotic
    • Inspiration
    • Family
    • Recipes
    • Campaign
    • Books Worth Reading

Supporting Her Husband

As mentioned above, the candidates’ wives are some of their largest supporters and their social networks provide a unique viewpoint. Both Michelle Obama and Ann Romney do an excellent job of supporting their husbands, not only by advocating for votes and donations, but also backing their respective platforms.

Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama Facebook - I've Got His Back
Michelle Obama Facebook - Fair Pay, Women's Health Care

Michelle Obama Twitter - Early Voting

Ann Romney

Ann Romney - Blogher
Ann Romney Facebook - Energey Independence
Ann Romney Twitter - Man of Character

Celebrating Family

During the campaign, the both Michelle and Ann use their social networks to remind followers that their lives encompass more than politics. These women are mothers as well, and through sentimental photos that show the other roles of their husbands, the wives humanize their husbands in a way that the candidate might not be able accomplish on his own.

Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama Pinterest - Children's Futures
Michelle Obama Facebook - First Lady Speech

Ann Romney

Ann Romney Pinterest - Easter Eggs
Ann Romney Pinterest - Papa

Reaching out to Women Voters

The spouses each have the ability to relate to women voters in a way that their husbands cannot. They often reach out to women voters individually and promote their events through their social networks.

Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama Facebook - Women for Obama

Ann Romney

Ann Romney Facebook - Women-owned Businesses

Milestones on Timeline

Both wives have utilized their timelines to show important events. This allows followers a glimpse into the lives of these women.

Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama Facebook - Early Voting

Ann Romney

Ann Romney - Tampa Republican National Convention

Personal Causes

It’s not all about the campaign trail for these women, it’s also about reaching out to people and donating their personal time to raise awareness for causes each fervently believes in. Ann is known for her support for breast cancer research and Michelle is known for promoting a healthy active lifestyle through her organization, Get Moving.

Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama Pinterest - Biggest Loser

Ann Romney

Ann Romney Facebook - Breast Cancer

Key Takeaways

Both Ann Romney and Michelle Obama’s social media channels demonstrate the time and effort each puts into their husbands campaign, as well as reinforcing their goals. The campaign then becomes visible through another set of eyes and followers are able to see facets of the candidate, which may not be readily visible in the news. The audience is also privy to the lives of these women, and are able to connect to the candidates in a way that may have not been otherwise possible.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Can social media propel 'rock star' politician Imran Khan to power in Pakistan?


In a country known for its constant chaos, nobody can make a crowd stop and listen quite like Imran Khan.

Whether commanding a rally of hundreds-of thousands in a Lahore park, a roundtable of experts in an Islamabad hotel or a garden of politicized housewives in a Karachi country club, Pakistan's legendary former cricket captain exudes charisma. Even his unfinished "peace rally" to protest hugely unpopular U.S. drone strikes - which Pakistani officials halted before it reached its destination in South Waziristan - earned him headlines around the world.

Khan, 60, is widely seen as one of the country's most popular politician as well as its most eligible bachelor.  And if opinion polls are to be believed, he will play a key role in the formation of Pakistan's next government. 

But Khan is not business as usual for Pakistan.

He commands serious star power despite not belonging to the landed or industrial dynasties that have ruled the country since its birth in 1947. Nor is he part of the country's military, which has governed the Islamic Republic for more than three of its six and half decades. Instead, he shot to fame as a star of cricket, a game that has a near-religious following in Pakistan.  On his way, he married - and divorced - glamorous British socialite Jemima Goldsmith.

He does not appear to court the traditional media, although it certainly chases him. 

The waiting list for television anchors and reporters hoping to snag a one-on-one with Khan is around two months long. He has written-off Pakistan's rambunctious mainstream and privately owned media as 
"prone to being corrupt" and "marginal to vested interests."

So what is the secret to Khan's success in projecting his political agenda across Pakistan?  In short, it's what he calls the "democratic and incorruptible" forces of Twitter, Facebook and other forms of social media.

Khan's messages -- which almost always hinge on his apparent anger over the United States' demands on Pakistan -- make him the country's most-followed presence on Facebook and Twitter.  He is particularly popular among Pakistan's wired urban youth.  But while Khan's popularity online cannot be contested, whether it will translate into victory at the ballot box remains the big question. 
'Taliban Khan'
Critics contend that Khan is simply bitter about criticism he's received from established members of the media.  In particular, journalists and commentators question the former cricket star's popular but difficult to implement policies -- an end to official corruption within 90 days, cessation of all hostilities with militants, halt to CIA drone attacks and rejection of American aid.

Especially since the assassination attempt on a 14-year-old education activist Malala Yousufzai, Khan's refusal to wholeheartedly condemn all militancy and terror has prompted his critics to call him soft on terror. 

While Khan's ideas have earned him the teasing but telling moniker "Taliban Khan" from members of the Westernized elite, they have proved wildly popular online.  

There is the official Facebook page for Khan (with about 487,000 'likes'). Its fans outnumber his party's official page by more than 100,000 members.


Khan also has about 400,000 followers on Twitter -- along with several assistants handling his and attached accounts -- tweeting rants, pictures and quotes from Pakistan's founders around the clock.
If social-media popularity equaled election results, Khan would already have a few terms under his belt.  

In fact, so pervasive is his online persona that his detractors have branded him a virtual politician.  
However, while Khan might be the country's most popular political figure, he is hardly the Islamic Republic's most powerful; he boycotted the last election and his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) or Movement for Justice party, has no presence in a parliament.

Wired, but do they vote?
Whether Khan can translate online support into victory at the ballot box is highly contested. (When new elections will actually be held hasn't been decided although many expect them to be held in spring or summer 2013.) 

"Imran Khan's base, his core support, is urban, middle class and educated -- precisely the cohort that has access to the Internet and spends time online," Cyril Almeida, who pens one of Pakistan's most-read columns for Dawn newspaper, told NBC News. "Hence, his substantial online support. ... PTI is building a voter base starting from the social media."

 Almeida acknowledges that former President Pervez Musharraf -- who led the country from 2001 to 2008 and now lives in exile in London -- also has a substantial online following but "wouldn't win a local councilor seat if he stood for one."

"Imran is somewhere in between," Almeida said. "His rock star status online is wildly more exaggerated than his real-world support -- though he will win at least some seats come election time."

Others, like Fahd Hussain, a primetime anchor at Waqt TV, which belongs to one of Pakistan's oldest and most conservatively aligned news conglomerates, says the Internet could still generate a Khan "tsunami."

"[The] social media support base of Imran should not be ignored," Hussain said. "It's massive and growing and creates political momentum."

Others question what online popularity will translate into, if anything.

Gibran Peshimam, the political editor of the Express Tribune newspaper, says that while Khan may be a heavyweight on the Internet, he is more of a lightweight offline.  

"The percentage of Pakistan's population that has access to the Internet barely breaks the double-digit barrier," he told NBC News. "In any case, the majority percentage of those who have this access to the Internet, and hence social media, is a non-voting sector. The well-to-do generally do not vote in Pakistan. They talk about voting, but barely any of them are even registered to vote."

"Large-scale support on the Internet in Pakistan does translate into numbers, given the youth bulge, but it certainly does not translate into large numbers -- unlike, perhaps, in the U.S.," he added.

Dr Awab Alvi is Imran Khan's social media guru. A part-time politico, Alvi is an Ivy-League trained orthodontist by day, and the brains behind the powerful outfit that is Khan's social media machine by night.
Echoes of Obama '08?
The comparison to the United States is a common one in Pakistan, and linked to the Khan camp's obsession with President Barack Obama's 2008 campaign in which social media played a key role in fundraising as well as getting younger Americans out to vote. So-called Khanophiles constantly point to the Obama '08 template as one that can be replicated, with some qualifications and modifications, in the Islamic Republic.

Two such Khanophiles are Awab Alvi and Faisal Javed.
Alvi is a tall, soft-spoken and self-declared geek who signs his emails as BDS, MSc & TED Senior Fellow.

Although Alvi, is a University of Pennsylvania-trained orthodontist who says he does not hold any office in the burgeoning PTI, the 36-year-old's non-stop Twitter feed gives him away as Khan's constantly-connected social media wizard.  His user ID, Teeth Maestro, one of the best known in Pakistani cyberspace, hints at both his full-time hospital job in Karachi and his part-time political potency.

His blogs generate as much revenue as a successful small business, and the official site of the PTI that he helps administer often crashes because of the high traffic his online events generate.  Alvi says the PTI has a 25-strong social media team featuring "volunteers scattered all over the globe."

Faisal Javed, 31, is a telecom executive by day and a PTI deputy secretary by political leaning. He spends Monday to Friday at the chic Islamabad headquarters of Telenor, leading the Scandinavian cellular giant's advertisement buying and content strategy for Pakistan.

But his evenings and weekends are reserved for the PTI.  Javed, who opens rallies for Khan, is known nationally as Khan's "stage secretary," introducing him to crowds across the country. His easy confidence and broadcaster's voice make him one of the more prominent young faces of Khan's media-savvy corps.

Behind the scenes at Khan's first Google+ Hangout, the zeal to replicate Obama's PR accomplishments was obvious.  As soon as Khan rolled in (along with a small army of assistants, advisers and bodyguards), Alvi and his team adopted a very American, no-nonsense mood that is not typical of Pakistani culture.

They kicked out all people dubbed "non-essentials" and started what seemed like a haphazard pre-battle briefing.

"How many people are watching me?" Khan asked.

"Thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions might be watching," said Alvi and his lieutenants speaking over each other.

Khan: "What does this mean, 'Google Hangout'?"

Alvi/his geeks: "People submitted questions, and then voted in the most questions. In three days, 15,000 questions were submitted and 13,000 questions were crowd-sourced via (text messages)."
Khan: "Is this live?"

Alvi/his geeks: "Yes! Obama has done it too! Ten people from all over the country and the world will interact with you. The questions and questioners have been chosen. All you have to do is answer them."

The audio wouldn't connect for 20 minutes after the Hangout was scheduled, and even as the event went online, some anchors on Pakistan's infamous conspiracy-theory driven national television denounced the event as a "drama" which was "staged" and "not live," much to Alvi and his team's chagrin.  

A small Twitter/Facebook skirmish between the Khan camp and his detractors later ensued, where both sides argued over the "reality" of the Hangout. The skirmish lasted about a week.

But overall the Hangout event went pretty much as planned. Khan waxed eloquent about the economy, militancy, America, education and Pakistan's several other existential crises. He promised to raze the walls of governors' mansions, pledged to make them public libraries and explained progressive taxation to a female college student.

In what was perhaps the most important sign of success, the event caused #HangoutwithIK to trend on Twitter. But what really made political history in Pakistan was that the national conversation of the country was fully online and not broadcast on television and radio for the first time. 

Later, Javed unwound with a Marlboro.

"You know why he did it? You know how he handled all those questions? Because he's neat and clean and has nothing to hide," he said.

What of the rural heartland?
Still, even if Khan's PTI wins seats in parliament on the back of his social-media campaign, he is still a long way from power, some analysts say. 

"The next step, to premiership, goes through the dusty, deceitful and a whole-lot-less-plugged-in territory of Pakistan's rural heartland," political editor Peshimam says.

Most of Pakistan's civilian power players have traditionally relied on the country's teeming rural areas for their support-bases.

Asif Ali Zardari's Pakistan People's Party, which leads the current coalition government, is entrenched in rural Sindh  -- the country's second-most populous province. Nawaz Sharif's Pakistan Muslim League (N-???) has always relied on, and thus come to dominate, the lush swathes of central and northern Punjab.

While Khan is pushing hard to topple the de facto but unofficial two-party system by becoming a third force via social media, Pakistan remains a poor and rural-majority country where just 20 million of its 180-million people are connected to the Internet.

"Several polls show that as a leader Imran Khan is very popular," says Raza Rumi, director of policy and programs at Islamabad-based think tank The Jinnah Institute. "(But) there are methodological problems with such surveys and often their urban bias has also been called into question.

"Khan will emerge as a political player in the next parliament but it would be premature to say what would be the strength of his party," Rumi added. "His huge presence on social media is linked to a substantial following, especially in the young segment of population. There is a strong relationship here. 

But to assume that Facebook or Twitter rankings will result in electoral gains across Pakistan would be wrong."

But Khanophiles like Javed, the telecom executive, aren't discouraged by such such sober assessments. 
"We can't ignore this medium.  There are two million of us [supporting PTI on social media]. And those two million have millions of friends and family members," he said during preparations for the Google+ Hangout session.

"And while you may be right again that those two million are largely in the cities, they are a degree or two away from spreading our message to the towns and villages. And that's good enough for me."


Orignal Article










Monday, October 15, 2012

4 Tips for Politicians on Twitter


Senior executives and other important folks have a peculiar relationship with social media.
study earlier this year found that 80% of people thought that executives that use social media are better equipped to lead their organisations. However a couple of other studies found that just 30% of senior executives have any kind of social media presence, and just 10% of CIOs use social media.
So news this week that UK prime minister David Cameron has joined Twitter should be a good thing, right? Well yes and no. Whilst it’s positive that the prime minister is present on social media there are ways of doing things, and ways of not doing things. Let me outline a bit of what I mean.

Substance over style

With any social media presence you have on the web you should have a clearly defined purpose for it. This is especially so for senior people that have incredibly busy lives. When every minute of the day has to be accounted for and maximised you need to make sure that your time is achieving results.
So what is the purpose for David Cameron creating a Twitter account? Suffice to say it’s hard to know for certain, but it seems possible that with the US presidential elections encouraging more social media chatter than ever before he wants to appear with it. Just being there doesn’t really cut the mustard though, especially if it’s your PR team that do the tweeting (more of that later).
So my tip #1 for Cameron is figure out what it is you want to achieve, and then measure how often you achieve that.

Measure the right things

Ok, measurement. It’s a hot topic on social media as many people get it so badly wrong. Nowhere is this more so than in politics. It seems that politicians see the number of Twitter followers as a kind of proxy for their overall popularity with voters. Kinda like the ultimate social proof.
The problem is though that this then encourages shady behaviour. After all, it’s much easier to acquire Twitter followers than it is voters. You only have to ask Mitt Romney, who magically gained a few hundred thousand earlier this year. As far as I can tell though, most fake accounts aren’t registered to vote.
So tip #2 for Cameron is to not get bogged down with chasing followers. Use Twitter for something more meaningful than faux popularity.

Be real

During the last election campaign there were a number of billboards where the photo of David Cameron looked all a bit like a wax work. Whilst I don’t think many people expect politicians to have any clue about them or their lives, a bit of authenticity would do no harm in reclaiming some credibility for the political classes.
Alas I suspect that most of the tweets made to the new account will be made by a public relations team that will have screened every letter to make sure that the kind of cock ups that footballers regularly engage in don’t occur here.
The problem with that is that if people expect the tweets to be anodyne rubbish then it defeats any point of having it in the first place. For sure exhibit good judgement with what you share, but you have to be authentic to succeed on social media.
Tip #3 therefore is to reclaim ownership of the account and start doing it for himself. He doesn’t have the time then don’t have the account. Don’t try and pull the wool over peoples eyes though.

Talking rather than listening

The popular line is that politicians are public servants, here to do our bidding. The reality is often very different though. Social media should change that because it allows people to listen and talk with customers and other end users of the services they provide like never before.
Will David Cameron be doing that though? I suspect not. He’s following a handful of people so far, but unfortunately they’re all fellow politicians, so I can’t see him learning anything new from reading their accounts. It’s also doubtful that he’s replying to messages or in any way engaging in conversation with his followers.
Social media isn’t a broadcast medium, it’s a relational medium. You win with it when you use it to engage with your audience, soliciting their thoughts and ideas on how things can be done better. Sadly too many still use it to push out messages in the same way they’ve always done so via television and other media. It doesn’t seem like the Cameron account will be anything different.
So the fourth and final tip is to do more listening than talking. Use the account to engage with the country and set an example that politicians really are here to serve us rather than the other way round.
Of course it’s early days with the account, and it may yet confound my fears, but if it could abide by these four simple tips I feel it would not only deliver better results for the government, but would also do much more for the British population.
Here are those four tips again:
1. Have a clear purpose
2. Don't chase followers
3. Be authentic and run the account himself
4. Listen more than talk

Sunday, October 14, 2012

2012 Social Campaign Monitor: The Body Politic


What is the social media impact of a candidate’s “blink rate” or facial expression during a Presidential debate?  Is the impact real or simply a fascinating exercise in suspended animation?
Given its ability to process natural language, the sophisticated NetBase social analytics platform Insight Composer enables us to segment the lenses through which such debate events are socially “viewed.”  Doing so can become a useful gauge in signaling the true significance voters attach to candidate’s body language, and the delivery and tone in the literal language of his or her responses.
Despite the virtual unanimity of pundits, people surveyed by pollsters and news organizations before and after the debate, our Netbase Timeline showed that social sentiment for both candidates was on a near par.  Less than one hour after the debate—concluding which candidate brought his A-game and which candidate struck out at bat—net sentiment for both candidates took a plunge. 
 Image
To be sure, the reasons for each candidate’s sudden post-debate net sentiment nose-dive are distinct, but the plummet is a sign that voter affinity for a candidate is deeply impacted by what they perceive in body language.  A DailyBeast analysis of the contenders’ body language concluded Mr. Romney exhibited “aggressive and manic” behavior, while President Obama showed “cool.” 
Like the stats on a scoreboard, clearly evident on our listening platform is the true impact of body language on voter perception. As such imagery as infographics and pictorial representations on Pinterest show, social marketing visual content today plays an integral roles in brand marketing.  And so, too, must the social listening of the conversations that surround non-verbal communication, as shown in the Attributes cloud for President Obama below. 
 Image
Anthropologists and other body language experts tend to offer variable interpretations of facial expression, but they do arrive at one consensus of opinion:  The human “blink factor” does signify the implication of truthfulness vs. dishonesty.  Rapid blinking also has been associated with “arrogance.”
If every picture tells a story, so does the “reality check” we took of the first Presidential debate, which has its own voter VOC.  Our CrossTab analysis chart shows both character and issues themes and offers visual reference of discussion volume segmented by theme.  This is a listening platform to measure and analyze the discussion on the issues and show how voters perceived the sincerity and/or disingenuous character of both candidates during the debate.  The reality check criteria filtered all data within 24 hours for terms including #truthful, trustworthy, #honest, trust, lying, believable, and blinking.
           Image
As we reach the seventh inning stretch of the 2012 electoral season, body language continues to make its mark on voter perception—not to mention a candidate’s  physique.  Voters also are significantly swayed by non-verbal communication and they are drawing vital correlations between a candidate’s character, leadership and competence.
So what’s the social body politic take on “blinking” during the debate?  Even absent the science, our reality check filter shows that the significance of body language in voter perception cannot be ignored or discarded.  Further, a social listening platform must not be ruled out as an invaluable barometer of social voter sentiment.
The following is a random sampling from 650 Facebook and Twitter posts filtered for “blinking” exhibited by Mr. Romney:
Obama- smirks, frowns and looking down at the podium? Romney- excessive blinking, "perma-grin" and smile.
#Romney blink rate is off the charts.
Midway thru debate they turned off AC at the debate & let the breeze from all of @mittromney's blinks cool off the audience.
I'm pretty sure the only person to blink more than Romney during a presidential debate is Nixon. 
Body language cues: Lots of blinking. Romney fidgeted quite a bit. Both had forced, and occasionally condescending, smiles.
This is a random sampling from 1,570 NetBase posts filtered for the “blinking” of President Obama:
U stood looking down most of the time, blinking and tightening your lips which U do when your mad, U lost!
It seems to me that the debate last night was a 'damned if you do, and damned if you don't' situation with President Obama.
The President's greatest nonverbal strength is his smile - which is most often genuine and warm - but even that faded last night. 
Congratulations to Mittens for passing Debate Skill 101.
Mitt Romney blinked more, while listening to President Obama, than the President blinked while listening to Mitt. Frequency Count: President Obama 18 blinks/30 sec. Mitt Romney 26 blinks/30 sec.
As “body politics” enter the arena of social analysis, determining whether predictive analytics can be correlated with a hypothetical exercise in suspended animation can prove a fascinating exercise.  At minimum, the analysis of social body language can provide the candidates and their surrogate sparring partners with useful rehearsal tips.
In the campaign’s final innings, debate performance can represent the home run or foul to left field.   Can social media decide the winner of a Presidential debate?  Or even predict the winner of the 2012 election? 
We shall see—and listen. 
Batter up.